[arch-dev-public] LTS kernel future
Greg KH just posted on the LKML this news: Here's the state of the -stable kernel trees, as of January 18, 2010. 2.6.27-stable ... I'll probably keep maintaining it for at least 6-8 more months, but after that, I can not guarantee it's viability. Note, one other developer has volunteered to pick up the tree after I am finished with it, but I can not speak for him at this time. ... 2.6.32-stable I'd like to announce that the 2.6.32-stable tree is also going to be maintained as a "long-term" stable release, living for 2-3 years, like the 2.6.27 kernel is. This is because a number (i.e. more than 2) Linux distributions are basing their "enterprise" releases on this kernel version, and it will make their lives easier if I keep it alive. ... I suggest to move our LTS kernel to .32 series not before our kernel26 has moved to .33 series. Better a bit later than to fast. -Andy
Am Montag 18 Januar 2010 schrieb Andreas Radke:
Greg KH just posted on the LKML this news:
Here's the state of the -stable kernel trees, as of January 18, 2010.
2.6.27-stable ... I'll probably keep maintaining it for at least 6-8 more months, but after that, I can not guarantee it's viability. Note, one other developer has volunteered to pick up the tree after I am finished with it, but I can not speak for him at this time. ... 2.6.32-stable
I'd like to announce that the 2.6.32-stable tree is also going to be maintained as a "long-term" stable release, living for 2-3 years, like the 2.6.27 kernel is. This is because a number (i.e. more than 2) Linux distributions are basing their "enterprise" releases on this kernel version, and it will make their lives easier if I keep it alive. ...
I suggest to move our LTS kernel to .32 series not before our kernel26 has moved to .33 series. Better a bit later than to fast.
-Andy
I would like to move it sooner than later, early userspace needs more recent kernel without having hacks and workarounds. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 22:44 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
I would like to move it sooner than later, early userspace needs more recent kernel without having hacks and workarounds.
There's no point in having an LTS kernel that matches the version of kernel26, so we should move kernel26 to kernel26-lts just before updating it to 2.6.33.
participants (3)
-
Andreas Radke
-
Jan de Groot
-
Tobias Powalowski