I want to replace pkg-config with pkgconf, an implementation that's actively maintained.
pkgconf is reportedly both faster and has saner behavior.
For example, right now `pkg-config --exists OpenEXR` fails if glu is not installed, since OpenEXR has a "private" dependency on glu. However, `pkg-config --libs OpenEXR` works since pkg-config ignores private dependencies here.
Private dependencies are relevant for static linking, analogous to a shared library's DT_NEEDED tags. `pkg-config --static --libs OpenEXR` lists the libraries necessary to statically link OpenEXR.
pkgconf is more consistent and follows private dependencies only if --static is given, regardless of whether --libs or --exists is used.
pkgconf is in use by at least FreeBSD, NetBSD, Fedora and Mageia; so we wouldn't be the first ones making the switch.
There's already a package in [community] owned by demize. I would make some adjustments before releasing it to [testing].
Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public firstname.lastname@example.org on Thu, 2018/05/24 23:19:
No, go for it!
Remember to add provides and replaces, and add it to the base-devel group.
We have a number of packages that list 'pkg-config' in makedepends. I guess these should be touched any time soon.