[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libusb-0.1.12-4
Hi, Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit. Signoff both, Allan
Am Samstag 20 Februar 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
Hi,
Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit.
Signoff both, Allan signoff both, greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit.
Signoff both, Allan
Do you have any ideas about a possible move to libusb1+libusb-compat? The 0.x version is no longer developed, and through libusb-compat, libusb1 is backwards compatible.
On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit.
Do you have any ideas about a possible move to libusb1+libusb-compat? The 0.x version is no longer developed, and through libusb-compat, libusb1 is backwards compatible.
I looked at that a couple of weeks back and it seems the rebuild would be rather simple. Given a libusb1 package was added to the repos rather than upsting libusb to the 1.0 branch and adding the compat package, I assumed there was a reason for not doing so. If not, we should do this so create a rebuild list. Allan
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 23:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit.
Do you have any ideas about a possible move to libusb1+libusb-compat? The 0.x version is no longer developed, and through libusb-compat, libusb1 is backwards compatible.
I looked at that a couple of weeks back and it seems the rebuild would be rather simple. Given a libusb1 package was added to the repos rather than upsting libusb to the 1.0 branch and adding the compat package, I assumed there was a reason for not doing so. If not, we should do this so create a rebuild list.
What rebuild list? libusb-compat should be backwards compatible with libusb0.
On 21/02/10 00:18, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 23:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 20/02/10 23:35, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:29 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Just a rebuild to get rid of the .FILELIST file in the package. Also added sh as a dep for the libusb-config script and tidied the PKGBUILD a bit.
Do you have any ideas about a possible move to libusb1+libusb-compat? The 0.x version is no longer developed, and through libusb-compat, libusb1 is backwards compatible.
I looked at that a couple of weeks back and it seems the rebuild would be rather simple. Given a libusb1 package was added to the repos rather than upsting libusb to the 1.0 branch and adding the compat package, I assumed there was a reason for not doing so. If not, we should do this so create a rebuild list.
What rebuild list? libusb-compat should be backwards compatible with libusb0.
Won't packages depending on libusb and which will really need libusb-compat need rebuilt to fix the deps? Or would we create one package containing both libusb-1 + libusb-compat. Allan
participants (3)
-
Allan McRae
-
Jan de Groot
-
Tobias Powalowski