[arch-dev-public] moving lz4 to [core]
Hi, lz4 is growing in popularity as a compression algorithm. As of systemd 216, systemd-journald supports lz4 (in addition to xz). Benchmarks[1] were provided at the time Zbigniew wrote the patches to show the impressive drop in CPU required to compress journal files. There's already a feature request to enable this[2], and a complaint about the excessive CPU usage of XZ in the presence of a program which doesn't behave[3] in some given environment. So, with that, is anyone opposed to moving lz4 to [core] so that systemd can sanely depend on it? Cheers, d [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-July/021048.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41721 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41728
On 28 August 2014 04:10, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
Hi,
lz4 is growing in popularity as a compression algorithm. As of systemd 216, systemd-journald supports lz4 (in addition to xz). Benchmarks[1] were provided at the time Zbigniew wrote the patches to show the impressive drop in CPU required to compress journal files.
There's already a feature request to enable this[2], and a complaint about the excessive CPU usage of XZ in the presence of a program which doesn't behave[3] in some given environment.
So, with that, is anyone opposed to moving lz4 to [core] so that systemd can sanely depend on it?
Cheers, d
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-July/021048.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41721 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41728
+1 Seems like a good idea to use LZ4 for core dumps.
participants (2)
-
Dave Reisner
-
Evangelos Foutras