[arch-dev-public] monotone needs boost 1.8.x
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost < 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR What do you think about? Regards -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On 01/26/2010 06:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost< 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR
What do you think about?
Regards
clarification, is botan not boost
On 01/26/2010 06:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost< 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR
What do you think about?
Regards
-- Ionut
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Ionut Biru
On 01/26/2010 06:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost< 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR
What do you think about?
Regards
clarification, is botan not boost
can't we or upstream fix it to work with botan 1.9.x ? Ronald
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 17:30:28 Ronald van Haren wrote:
can't we or upstream fix it to work with botan 1.9.x ? I think they are not interested to fix this. They released a new montone a week ago without fix this and I did not find any bug or thread on their ML.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On 01/26/2010 06:25 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/26/2010 06:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost< 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR
What do you think about?
Regards
clarification, is botan not boost
we didn't have much replies here about what method we should implement. I tend to like 1) more and if there are not complains, i'll commit the changes tonight. -- Ionut
On 05/03/10 22:24, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/26/2010 06:25 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/26/2010 06:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi DEVs, monotone in [extra] does not work with the current boost (FS#17297). It requires explicitly boost< 1.9. It's orphan too. So, we have two possibility now: 1) add boost18 to [extra] 2) move monotone to AUR
What do you think about?
Regards
clarification, is botan not boost
we didn't have much replies here about what method we should implement. I tend to like 1) more and if there are not complains, i'll commit the changes tonight.
Changed the title to reflect botan not boost dep. Looking at the release notes, monotone appears to ship with an internal version of botan. Can you just use that rather than making an additional package? As an aside, I had never heard of monotone before which makes me think that this could be an AUR candidate. I could be very wrong... Allan
On Friday 05 March 2010 14:55:56 Allan McRae wrote:
Changed the title to reflect botan not boost dep. Thank you
As an aside, I had never heard of monotone before which makes me think that this could be an AUR candidate. I could be very wrong... IMHO it could be moved to AUR.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andrea Scarpino
On Friday 05 March 2010 14:55:56 Allan McRae wrote:
Changed the title to reflect botan not boost dep. Thank you
As an aside, I had never heard of monotone before which makes me think that this could be an AUR candidate. I could be very wrong... IMHO it could be moved to AUR.
I think I dragged this into the repos a few years ago when it appeared it might become one of the big DVCS tools. This one stayed under the radar compared to git and mercurial, however. Pidgin does use it for what it is worth to manage their codebase. -Dan
On Friday 05 March 2010 17:54:25 Marq Schneider wrote:
I wanted to ask: why did botan get updated to using the development (1.9.x) branch instead of the stable (1.8.x) branch? Arch jumped from 1.8.5 to 1.9.3 back in November. I am all for keeping packages up-to-date, but i am not sure that i agree with hopping to the development branch. I don't follow the botan mailing list at all, but the stable branch is still worked on (now up to 1.8.8). If nothing requires 1.9.x, would it do any harm to revert botan to 1.8.x? No one notice us of this before.
Someone flagged it as out-of-date and I, stupid, updated it without look at upstream site where they say that botan 1.9.x is the development trunk. I am looking if this will broke anything, otherwise I will proceed downgrading botan to 1.8.8. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Friday 05 March 2010 18:00:32 you wrote:
I am looking if this will broke anything, otherwise I will proceed downgrading botan to 1.8.8. Ok, only 2 packages depends on it and they will need a rebuild. I am building botan 1.8.8, then I will rebuild them. Should be fine.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On 03/05/2010 07:00 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2010 17:54:25 Marq Schneider wrote:
I wanted to ask: why did botan get updated to using the development (1.9.x) branch instead of the stable (1.8.x) branch? Arch jumped from 1.8.5 to 1.9.3 back in November. I am all for keeping packages up-to-date, but i am not sure that i agree with hopping to the development branch. I don't follow the botan mailing list at all, but the stable branch is still worked on (now up to 1.8.8). If nothing requires 1.9.x, would it do any harm to revert botan to 1.8.x? No one notice us of this before.
Someone flagged it as out-of-date and I, stupid, updated it without look at upstream site where they say that botan 1.9.x is the development trunk.
I am looking if this will broke anything, otherwise I will proceed downgrading botan to 1.8.8.
afaik only two packages needs that. +1 for downgrading and rebuilding monotone against it. -- Ionut
participants (6)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Dan McGee
-
Ionut Biru
-
Ionut Biru
-
Ronald van Haren