On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee wrote:

On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the DEBUG flag from the build.

If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.

Good here for i686.

Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.

2007/12/13, Eric Belanger :

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the DEBUG flag from the build.

If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.

Good here for i686.

Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.

signing off for both arches.

signed off (i686). -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

Thursday 03 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: | On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych wrote: | > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger : | > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote: | > > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee wrote: | > > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote: | > > >>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and | > > >>> removed the DEBUG flag from the build. | > > >>> | > > >>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're | > > >>> in business. | > > >> | > > >> Good here for i686. | > > > | > > > Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've | > > > been using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please | > > > signoff. | > > | > > signing off for both arches. | > | > signed off (i686). | | Um...ping? This getting moved anytime soon? no trouble on x86_64 yet (bzip and gzip)... but i do not feel competent enough to test it profoundly, to be honest. - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><

On Jan 2, 2008 7:39 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

I'm guessing you got confused with libarchive. :) This is actually really old and is the signoff for libdownload. I've just pushed it to core for both architectures as it seems we had enough signoffs, and we are all responsible anyway.

Yeah, I have a few of these I mentally lost over the holidays For the record, the new dashboard lists packages by repository, so this should help me in keeping track of signoffs and what needs to move better (gmail isn't cutting it for that task). In the (near?) future I want to integrate signoffs into the dashboard, which would make this far easier.