[arch-dev-public] pkgs with tetex dependency
Here are packages in extra that depend on tetex (which has now been replaced by texlive-core): makedepends: evince yodl depends: kile lyx latex2html texmacs I found those using find /var/abs -name PKGBUILD -exec grep -H tetex '{}' \; so I should not have missed any. There is no hurry since texlive-core provides tetex anyway. Regards, F
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@gmx.net> wrote:
Here are packages in extra that depend on tetex (which has now been replaced by texlive-core):
makedepends: evince yodl depends: kile lyx latex2html texmacs
I found those using find /var/abs -name PKGBUILD -exec grep -H tetex '{}' \; so I should not have missed any.
There is no hurry since texlive-core provides tetex anyway.
I would imagine no one would mind if you rebuilt some of these if you had the time, especially those closely related such as lyx, latex2html. latex2html looks old as heck, their site is kind of funny, especially the logo: http://saftsack.fs.uni-bayreuth.de/~latex2ht/ -Dan
Dan McGee a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@gmx.net> wrote:
Here are packages in extra that depend on tetex (which has now been replaced by texlive-core):
makedepends: evince yodl depends: kile lyx latex2html texmacs
I found those using find /var/abs -name PKGBUILD -exec grep -H tetex '{}' \; so I should not have missed any.
There is no hurry since texlive-core provides tetex anyway.
I would imagine no one would mind if you rebuilt some of these if you had the time, especially those closely related such as lyx, latex2html.
Well, I don't think those need to be rebuilt (I can just modify the PKGBUILD in svn pending the next update), but it could not hurt to do so for evince (which I use daily) and yodl (which I had never heard of before). If no one opposes I will put this on my TODO list.
latex2html looks old as heck, their site is kind of funny, especially the logo: http://saftsack.fs.uni-bayreuth.de/~latex2ht/
:-) But was that the standard for high-quality back in 2001? In any case since it looks as though latex2html is no longer maintained, I would favour moving it to community. texlive-htmlxml includes latest tex4ht which is far superior. F
participants (2)
-
Dan McGee
-
Firmicus