[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.039
Pretty much just a patch level bump, I think this release also re-adds the bashbug binary in there too. Can't build for x86_64 just yet, so if someone could do that, that'd be great.
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:34 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Pretty much just a patch level bump, I think this release also re-adds the bashbug binary in there too.
Can't build for x86_64 just yet, so if someone could do that, that'd be great.
Signoff, i686
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Pretty much just a patch level bump, I think this release also re-adds the bashbug binary in there too.
Can't build for x86_64 just yet, so if someone could do that, that'd be great.
Man pages are not FSH compliant. Please fix then I'll build it for x86_64. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Pretty much just a patch level bump, I think this release also re-adds the bashbug binary in there too.
Can't build for x86_64 just yet, so if someone could do that, that'd be great.
Man pages are not FSH compliant. Please fix then I'll build it for x86_64.
Whoops, I totally missed that one. -2 is uploaded to testing with compliant man pages. Just a quick note: the "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard" is abbreviated FHS, which is annoying because I always want to type what you just did with "filesystem" -> "FS"
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Pretty much just a patch level bump, I think this release also re-adds the bashbug binary in there too.
Can't build for x86_64 just yet, so if someone could do that, that'd be great.
Man pages are not FSH compliant. Please fix then I'll build it for x86_64.
Whoops, I totally missed that one. -2 is uploaded to testing with compliant man pages.
x86_64 package is in testing.
Just a quick note: the "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard" is abbreviated FHS, which is annoying because I always want to type what you just did with "filesystem" -> "FS"
That's good to know. Then, I've been using the the wrong abbreviation in the svn log messages and in my package's ChangeLog. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Signoff 3.2.039-2 i686 Allan
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Signoff 3.2.039-2 i686
Allan
Ping. Need 2 x86_64 signoffs
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Signoff 3.2.039-2 i686
Allan
Ping. Need 2 x86_64 signoffs
You mean 1 signoff, right? I automatically did a signoff when I uploaded the x86_64 package in testing. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Signoff 3.2.039-2 i686
Allan
Ping. Need 2 x86_64 signoffs
You mean 1 signoff, right? I automatically did a signoff when I uploaded the x86_64 package in testing.
Good point. So one signoff then 8)
Am Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:45:26 -0500 schrieb "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Signoff 3.2.039-2 i686
Allan
Ping. Need 2 x86_64 signoffs
You mean 1 signoff, right? I automatically did a signoff when I uploaded the x86_64 package in testing.
Good point. So one signoff then 8)
signoff x86_64. -AndyRTR
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Andreas Radke
-
Eduardo Romero
-
Eric Belanger