[arch-dev-public] hardlink in util-linux
Hello everybody, upstream util-linux replaced the current implementation of hardlink (which we do not ship) with Debian's [0]. For util-linux 2.37 I plan to package the hardlink executable and set provides, conflicts and replaces on hardlink package. Any objections? [0] https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/2180ecc81b5f7635adbe5412010642... -- main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);}
On 2/17/21 6:18 AM, Christian Hesse via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hello everybody,
upstream util-linux replaced the current implementation of hardlink (which we do not ship) with Debian's [0]. For util-linux 2.37 I plan to package the hardlink executable and set provides, conflicts and replaces on hardlink package. Any objections?
[0] https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/2180ecc81b5f7635adbe5412010642...
This sounds like a great plan. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 12:18 +0100, Christian Hesse via arch-dev-public wrote:
upstream util-linux replaced the current implementation of hardlink (which we do not ship) with Debian's [0]. For util-linux 2.37 I plan to package the hardlink executable and set provides, conflicts and replaces on hardlink package. Any objections?
Reading last comment on [1] it was expected for 2.35, time flies. I'm happy this finally happen. You could also remove the hardlink packages from [community]. Regards, [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62896 -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
participants (3)
-
Christian Hesse
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Sébastien Luttringer