Forwarded a response from JaDa to myself: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: JaDa <jada@usalug.net> Date: Feb 13, 2008 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions To: "travis@archlinux.org" <travis@archlinux.org> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:58:00 -0800, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:

On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst depends on our packaging scheme?

Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages.

I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.

Don't change anything. Let it like it is. If you later running in trouble then think again. By the why, I am using at the Radeon Xpress 200m, 9550, X300, X1300, X850, and I didn't see any differant's. It works! If it doesn't work I will email you ;) cheers JaDa -- Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.