[arch-dev-public] Fwd: Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions
Forwarded a response from JaDa to myself:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JaDa
On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych
wrote: Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst depends on our packaging scheme?
Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages.
I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.
Don't change anything. Let it like it is. If you later running in trouble then think again. By the why, I am using at the Radeon Xpress 200m, 9550, X300, X1300, X850, and I didn't see any differant's. It works! If it doesn't work I will email you ;) cheers JaDa -- Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
participants (1)
-
Travis Willard