[arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.2-1
Fairly minor bug fix release over 8.1 which has been in [testing] for a long time, but a major jump over what is currently in [core]. I have been using the pre-release snapshots without any issues. Upstream ChangeLog: ** Bug fixes id's use of mgetgroups no longer writes beyond the end of a malloc'd buffer [bug introduced in coreutils-8.1] id no longer crashes on systems without supplementary group support. [bug introduced in coreutils-8.1] rm once again handles zero-length arguments properly. The rewrite to make rm use fts introduced a regression whereby a command like "rm a '' b" would fail to remove "a" and "b", due to the presence of the empty string argument. [bug introduced in coreutils-8.0] sort is now immune to the signal handling of its parent. Specifically sort now doesn't exit with an error message if it uses helper processes for compression and its parent ignores CHLD signals. [bug introduced in coreutils-6.9] tail without -f no longer access uninitialized memory [bug introduced in coreutils-7.6] timeout is now immune to the signal handling of its parent. Specifically timeout now doesn't exit with an error message if its parent ignores CHLD signals. [bug introduced in coreutils-7.6] a user running "make distcheck" in the coreutils source directory, with TMPDIR unset or set to the name of a world-writable directory, and with a malicious user on the same system was vulnerable to arbitrary code execution [bug introduced in coreutils-5.0] Signoff both, Allan
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Fairly minor bug fix release over 8.1 which has been in [testing] for a long time, but a major jump over what is currently in [core]. I have been using the pre-release snapshots without any issues.
Hasn't busted up my system yet. Signoff x86_64. -Dan
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 12/12/2009 12:54 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Fairly minor bug fix release over 8.1 which has been in [testing] for a long time, but a major jump over what is currently in [core]. I have been using the pre-release snapshots without any issues.
<snip>
Signoff both, Allan
signoff x86_64
and an i686 please?
On 15/12/2009, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
and an i686 please? signoff i686
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Dan McGee
-
Ionut Biru