[arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2 - Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[arch-dev-public] dash package in...

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2

older
[arch-dev-public] filesystem...

Thomas Bächler

28 Feb 2008 28 Feb '08

7:38 p.m.

I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev. Please sign off on the first three. klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

Attachments:

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 260 bytes)

Show replies by date

Travis Willard

2 Mar 2 Mar

2:56 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev.

Please sign off on the first three.

klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

I built a new initramfs with the testing klibc stuff and I can still boot. I don't know how to test it outside of that though - I'll signoff regardless

Travis Willard

2:57 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Travis Willard wrote:

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev.

Please sign off on the first three.

klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

I built a new initramfs with the testing klibc stuff and I can still boot. I don't know how to test it outside of that though - I'll signoff regardless

er, i686. Sorry

Roman Kyrylych

3:06 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2

2008/3/2, Travis Willard :

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev.

Please sign off on the first three.

klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

I built a new initramfs with the testing klibc stuff and I can still boot. I don't know how to test it outside of that though - I'll signoff regardless

I've just tried the v86d hook with klibc-based binary - and everything works perfectly, Signed off (i686). (btw, uvesafb is nice, yay!) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

Dan McGee

4 Mar 4 Mar

4:43 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Roman Kyrylych wrote:

2008/3/2, Travis Willard :

...
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev.

Please sign off on the first three.

klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

I built a new initramfs with the testing klibc stuff and I can still boot. I don't know how to test it outside of that though - I'll signoff regardless

I've just tried the v86d hook with klibc-based binary - and everything works perfectly, Signed off (i686). (btw, uvesafb is nice, yay!)

I'll give another safety signoff for i686. -Dan

Thomas Bächler

2 Mar 2 Mar

11:05 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-5

Only change compared to -4 is that kinit is replaced by kinit.shared and the static kinit is deleted. No idea why we didn't do this before.

Aaron Griffin

6 Mar 6 Mar

8:53 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-5

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

Only change compared to -4 is that kinit is replaced by kinit.shared and the static kinit is deleted. No idea why we didn't do this before.

Hrm, I just had an error, but it may have been my fault. I got the "replace: command not found" which means, for some reason, the klibc-extras binaries weren't in the image. I did have a patched version of klibc prior to -Syu'ing to this, so I had to -f some conflicts. Unless someone else has a similar issue, consider me signed off

Roman Kyrylych

9:06 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-5

2008/3/6, Aaron Griffin :

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Only change compared to -4 is that kinit is replaced by kinit.shared and the static kinit is deleted. No idea why we didn't do this before.

Hrm, I just had an error, but it may have been my fault. I got the "replace: command not found" which means, for some reason, the klibc-extras binaries weren't in the image.

I did have a patched version of klibc prior to -Syu'ing to this, so I had to -f some conflicts.

Unless someone else has a similar issue, consider me signed off

Hm, I have "/bin/{kbd_mode,loadkeys,setfont} not found" with the new kbd package I've built, *but* these files *were* in image, and that happened with older klibc version Aaron, could you please check (with break=y in kernel command line and then echo /bin/* in the prompt) if replace is really in image or this is the same weird error as I got. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

Aaron Griffin

9:41 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-5

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Roman Kyrylych wrote:

2008/3/6, Aaron Griffin :

...
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Only change compared to -4 is that kinit is replaced by kinit.shared and the static kinit is deleted. No idea why we didn't do this before.

Hrm, I just had an error, but it may have been my fault. I got the "replace: command not found" which means, for some reason, the klibc-extras binaries weren't in the image.

I did have a patched version of klibc prior to -Syu'ing to this, so I had to -f some conflicts.

Unless someone else has a similar issue, consider me signed off

Hm, I have "/bin/{kbd_mode,loadkeys,setfont} not found" with the new kbd package I've built, *but* these files *were* in image, and that happened with older klibc version Aaron, could you please check (with break=y in kernel command line and then echo /bin/* in the prompt) if replace is really in image or this is the same weird error as I got.

No I can't. Without klibc-extras the system will not boot. I had to boot with a livecd and rebuild the image.

Thomas Bächler

7:30 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-5

Aaron Griffin schrieb:

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Only change compared to -4 is that kinit is replaced by kinit.shared and the static kinit is deleted. No idea why we didn't do this before.

Hrm, I just had an error, but it may have been my fault. I got the "replace: command not found" which means, for some reason, the klibc-extras binaries weren't in the image.

I did have a patched version of klibc prior to -Syu'ing to this, so I had to -f some conflicts.

Unless someone else has a similar issue, consider me signed off

[x86_64][19:29:53][thomas@artin ~]$ type klibc-dash klibc-dash is aliased to `PS1="dash$ " PS2="> " PATH="/usr/lib/klibc/bin" /usr/lib/klibc/bin/sh' [x86_64][19:29:55][thomas@artin ~]$ klibc-dash dash$ replace usage: replace [-q] <string> <to replace> [<with what>]Segment violation dash$

5894

Age (days ago)

5901

Last active (days ago)

Download

9 comments

5 participants

tags

participants (5)

Aaron Griffin
Dan McGee
Roman Kyrylych
Thomas Bächler
Travis Willard