5 Jun
2020
5 Jun
'20
4:10 a.m.
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 21:38 +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
The biggest offender is the archive which seems to be requiring around ~ 1TB per year, this might be due to the nature of how we archive as heftig pointed out we could use btrfs snapshots however no one has stepped up and I don't expect anyone to.
Archive is saving space via hardlinks. This has serious performance shortcomings, but what kind of size improvement improvements we could expect from btrfs? Regards, Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer