October 2010 - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] ssh mutt etc problem
by Piyush P Kurur 18 Oct '10

18 Oct '10

Dear Archers, With the latest pacman -Syu I am getting segfaults with ssh and mutt. I think the two are related for the following reason (1) Mutt works alright till it tries to make SSL/TLS connection and then it seg faults (2) ssh directly seg faults I think this has got to do with an update in openssl (both mutt and openssh depends on this) although the openssl comman itself does not seem to have a problem Regards ppk

2 2

[arch-general] Network troubles
by Philipp 18 Oct '10

18 Oct '10

Hi, I recently dealt a lot with my laptops network configuration because I needed wlan for uni. Sadly the free driver for my chip still doesn't work, however, with the proprietary broadcom it works. While troubleshooting the wlan issues I ditched wicd (because it's buggy, even the dev doesn't use it anymore) and went a level lower. As stated before, wlan works at uni and at home as it should, using just wpa_supplicant and dhcpcd, however, I also need wired network at home, and whatever I try it just doesn't work. I suspect the problem might have existed with wicd already, as it worked with static IP, but not using dhcp. Now I try to use /etc/rc.d/network but without success so far. Here's some typical output: $ sudo /etc/rc.d/network restart Password: :: Stopping Network [DONE] :: Starting Network [BUSY] up: error fetching interface information: Device not found wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:69:73:3C:68 inet addr:192.168.1.6 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::222:69ff:fe73:3c68/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:12682 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:7068 TX packets:7825 errors:9 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:16755594 (15.9 Mb) TX bytes:652987 (637.6 Kb) Interrupt:17 [FAIL] The network fails to start most of the time, but manual ifconfig eth0 up and manual starting of dhcpcd works just fine. The probably relevant config parts are: /etc/rc.conf eth0="dhcp" INTERFACES=(lo eth0) DAEMONS=(syslog-ng sensors network @alsa @ntpd @crond @cups @laptop-mode) /etc/dhcpcd.conf # A sample configuration for dhcpcd. # See dhcpcd.conf(5) for details. # Inform the DHCP server of our hostname for DDNS. hostname # To share the DHCP lease across OSX and Windows a ClientID is needed. # Enabling this may get a different lease than the kernel DHCP client. # Some upstream DHCP servers may also require a ClientID, such as FRITZ!Box. #clientid # A list of options to request from the DHCP server. option domain_name_servers, domain_name, domain_search, host_name option classless_static_routes # Most distributions have NTP support. option ntp_servers # Respect the network MTU. option interface_mtu # A ServerID is required by RFC2131. require dhcp_server_identifier # A hook script is provided to lookup the hostname if not set by the DHCP # server, but it should not be run by default. nohook lookup-hostname noipv4ll I'm not sure what else is relevant. I especially have no idea where the error output comes from and what's wrong. I also assume dhcpcd is supposed to be running automatically by the network daemon/script, but that doesn't seem to happen in my case. Philipp

1 0

[arch-general] Question about arch packages
by Christian 18 Oct '10

18 Oct '10

Hi, In the PKBUILD script there is some times install followed by a couple of numbers, what are they for? Many thanks, Christian

4 3

[arch-general] The new Arch Haskell
by Magnus Therning 18 Oct '10

18 Oct '10

Sorry for x-posting this announcement, but I hope I won't be beaten up too much for it. Please send any replies to the Arch Haskell mailing list: http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell There is a new Arch Haskell team and we've made some changes. You can find more details at http://archhaskell.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/arch-haskell-under-new-manageme… /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] preparing LibreOffice
by Heiko Baums 17 Oct '10

17 Oct '10

Am Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:04:42 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke <a.radke(a)arcor.de>: > I'm going to prepare Arch builds for libreoffice in our svn but won't > upload any binary packages until the new way gets more clear. Why not uploading binary packages? Wouldn't be the worst idea to have both packages in the repo, so that users have the choice. Heiko

5 6

[arch-general] [OT]Disk showing too many bad sectors - is it going to fail ?
by Partha Chowdhury 17 Oct '10

17 Oct '10

I have a Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 family harddisk of 160gb capacity which is more than 3 years old. recently I installed gsmartcontrol and after running it, it showed number of current pending sector count and offline uncorrectable sectors as -- 4294967295.Fearing the disk going bad, i backed up data and started monitoring it. This is the latest gsmartcontrol shows - http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/5707/201010161300051280x1024.png After two weeks, the no. of bad sectors is the same and the disk shows no sign of failure (at the least there is no problem to read or write files from or to the disk).hence I am confused .is the disk going bad ? if it is fine why can't it remap all those bad sectors ?

4 5

Re: [arch-general] [OT]Disk showing too many bad sectors - is it going to fail ?
by Aljosha Papsch 17 Oct '10

17 Oct '10

The hard disk makes some funny noises (clicking, dangling, ...) and you wonder why some files are missing, though the disk is still "useable". Linux should throw a bunch of errors at boot time, but Windows (98) continues with its work until something crashes. Partha Chowdhury schrieb am So 17. Okt, 2010 16:55 CEST: >On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:48:06PM +0100, Mauro Santos wrote: >> If you can, try overwriting the whole disk with dd, or test it with >> badblocks using the write and readback test and see if anything >> changes. >> The not so worst case is that you caught an impending disk faillure >> before it caused trouble and you already have a backup, the best case >> is >> that you find out those values are bogus and should not be taken into >> account. > >i overwrote the whole disk with ddrescue -f /dev/zero /dev/sdb.After one >and a half hours later it stopped with the message "no space left on >device" - i guess it indicates no problem ? > >i also tried the badblocks program with -w option. It took a long time >5+ hours but did not report a bad sector. > >On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:17:50PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >> There have been a number of firmware changes/updates for seagate >> drives over the >> past 3 years and several "bad runs" of disks. Check the seagate >> support site and >> make sure you have the latest firmware for your drive. I have had the >> bad sector >> errors - sometimes a true failure, sometimes not. Just backup, monitor >> and if >> you continue to get the errors, drop of $50 on a new 1T drive. >> >I checked the seagate site and there is no firmware upgrade for this >model. On further googling, i found that seagate is only offering >firmware upgrades for 7200.12 model onwards. > >Now to be absolutely sure, i downloaded the seatools program and it ran >a short and long test which both said PASSED. > >Inspite of all these, gsmartcontrol shows the same. > >What are the indications before a disk is going bad which a normal user >can catch with bare eyes and ears ?

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [OT]Disk showing too many bad sectors - is it going to fail ?
by Aljosha Papsch 17 Oct '10

17 Oct '10

The hard disk makes some funny noises (clicking, dangling, ...) and you wonder why some files are missing, though the disk is still "useable". Linux should throw a bunch of errors at boot time, but Windows (98) continues with its work until something crashes. Partha Chowdhury schrieb am So 17. Okt, 2010 16:55 CEST: >On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:48:06PM +0100, Mauro Santos wrote: >> If you can, try overwriting the whole disk with dd, or test it with >> badblocks using the write and readback test and see if anything >> changes. >> The not so worst case is that you caught an impending disk faillure >> before it caused trouble and you already have a backup, the best case >> is >> that you find out those values are bogus and should not be taken into >> account. > >i overwrote the whole disk with ddrescue -f /dev/zero /dev/sdb.After one >and a half hours later it stopped with the message "no space left on >device" - i guess it indicates no problem ? > >i also tried the badblocks program with -w option. It took a long time >5+ hours but did not report a bad sector. > >On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:17:50PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >> There have been a number of firmware changes/updates for seagate >> drives over the >> past 3 years and several "bad runs" of disks. Check the seagate >> support site and >> make sure you have the latest firmware for your drive. I have had the >> bad sector >> errors - sometimes a true failure, sometimes not. Just backup, monitor >> and if >> you continue to get the errors, drop of $50 on a new 1T drive. >> >I checked the seagate site and there is no firmware upgrade for this >model. On further googling, i found that seagate is only offering >firmware upgrades for 7200.12 model onwards. > >Now to be absolutely sure, i downloaded the seatools program and it ran >a short and long test which both said PASSED. > >Inspite of all these, gsmartcontrol shows the same. > >What are the indications before a disk is going bad which a normal user >can catch with bare eyes and ears ?

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] hdparm-9.33-1
by Kazuo Teramoto 16 Oct '10

16 Oct '10

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Am Sonntag 10 Oktober 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: >> Hi guys, >> please signoff both arches [...] > bump If an user signoff help something... signoff x86_64 Regards, Kazuo -- «Dans la vie, rien n'est à craindre, tout est à comprendre» Marie Sklodowska Curie.

1 0

[arch-general] Udisks, uuid and very stange mount
by Fess 16 Oct '10

16 Oct '10

Have a nice day guys, If anyone use udisks and mount filesystems with it - please tell me, if there is any way t:o specify mounting point? Because if fs have no label(eg - ext2) udisks mounts it to /media/<uuid>. Bad idea. Really bad. Any suggestions, how to make /media/sdb1(example? --

3 6