March 2013 - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] community svntogit broken for a few days
by Armin K. 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

It just displays the same thing for some time ...

1 0

[arch-general] PPPoE server
by Pietro Paolini 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

Hello all, I installed successfully the roar-penguin pppoe-server and I try to use it without success, what I don't understand is that I put in my /etc/ppp/pppoe-server-options debug logfile /var/log/pppoe-server-log But that file is not created then I don't understand what happen and is really hard for me find a solution, do you know how can I enable the debugging ???!!! My problem is that I catch every time (Wireshark sniffing) the RP-PPPoE: Child pppd process terminated In the PADT message, any help ? Thanks in advance

1 0

[arch-general] More infos on failing archboot ISOs with Kernel Panic on start
by fredbezies 20 Mar '13

20 Mar '13

Some more infos. Only 32 bits versions seems to be working. I grabbed archlinux-2013.03-2-archboot-x86_64.iso, verified its checksum (which matches), and always I get : "Failed to execute /init" followed "Kernel Panic - not syncing : init not found". And I can see it with both qemu and VirtualBox. Need to make another round of dual and x86_64 archboot ISOs ? -- Frederic Bezies fredbezies(a)gmail.com

2 6

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
by Armin K. 20 Mar '13

20 Mar '13

On 03/20/2013 03:39 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2013-03-20 15:14:19 +1100] Gaetan Bisson: >> Deprecation of bind and dnsutils > > I've just moved dnsutils to [extra] and orphaned it as well as bind. > This announcement is postponed as long as somebody can manage to keep > BIND alive... > Why not keep bind9? ... It has not been abandoned upstream and I see no conflicts between bind9 and bind10 - think gtk+2 and gtk+3 ... Both can exist on the same system, but I doubt that two bind daemons can run at the same time.

3 2

[arch-general] Future of dmraid on nvidia chipsets in Arch?
by David C. Rankin 20 Mar '13

20 Mar '13

Dave, All, After reading https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31236, I am left with the question of "Can I move forward with Arch with my servers that have dmraid for / and /home with nvidia chipsets?" Thanks for the dmraid update dr, but will that package continue to be available? I have 3 dmraid production servers, all nvidia chipset based (reference https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installing_with_Fake_RAID) Bug 31236 addressed handling /home on dmraid, but excluded any discussion of / or /boot on dmraid. It also noted that the move from dmraid->mdraid was only supported for Intel chipset based controllers. Is there planned support for existing nvidia based dmraid arrays in Arch, whether by conversion to mdraid (when chipset support is available) or will the dmraid package (as patched by dreisner) continue to be available to support booting nvidia based systems under systemd? From a server standpoint (no dual-boot dmraid availability required), is the best long-term option to simply completely rebuild using mdraid (pure software raid) eliminating dmraid altogether? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

2 1

[arch-general] Hardlock after postfix/smtp entry in log - leaves 4 lost inodes each time - ideas?
by David C. Rankin 20 Mar '13

20 Mar '13

Guys, I have a server that will hardlock every week or two. The log entries always look the same. There is a postfix/smtp transaction in progress when the lock occurs. After the lockup you are dropped to maintenance mode on next reboot and there are always 4 inodes that are part of an orphaned link list that are fixed with fsck and then the machine reboot normally. The log entries just prior to the lockup look like this: Mar 17 16:07:16 phoenix postfix/anvil[26843]: statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for (smtp:213.199.243.30) at Mar 17 16:01:52 Mar 17 16:07:16 phoenix postfix/anvil[26843]: statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtp:213.199.243.30) at Mar 17 16:01:52 Mar 17 16:07:16 phoenix postfix/anvil[26843]: statistics: max cache size 1 at Mar 17 16:01:52 Mar 17 16:14:52 phoenix postfix/qmgr[1019]: 81963E9720: from=<inconsiderableka04(a)gil.com.au>, size=7485, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 17 16:14:52 phoenix postfix/smtp[26899]: 81963E9720: to=<**snipped**(a)3111skyline.com>, relay=3111skyline.com[66.76.63.120]:25, delay=1118, delays=1118/0.02/0.16/0.17, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred (host 3111skyline.com[66.76.63.120] said: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [66.76.63.60] (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Mar 18 07:34:19 phoenix kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Mar 18 07:34:19 phoenix kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Mar 18 07:34:19 phoenix kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.4.7-1-ARCH (tobias@T-POWA-LX) (gcc version 4.7.1 20120721 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 I cannot find any connection between the postfix/smtp and the lockup searching the web. So I'm asking here, has anyone else seen a lockup where the last log entry is a postfix/smtp entry and then experienced a 4 orphaned inode error on reboot? This has occurred multiple times over the past year or so. memtest completes without error and the drives show no other errors or issues. Drive temps are stable at: /dev/sda: ST3250410AS: 35°C /dev/sdb: ST3250410AS: 39°C Any feedback welcomed. Otherwise, it looks like this has to be hardware. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

2 3

[arch-general] Installing by remote control
by David Benfell 20 Mar '13

20 Mar '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm currently running Arch Linux on a Linode. I'm happy--actually, real happy--with Arch, not so happy with the constraints I'm facing with the Linode. Casting about, I find Contabo in Germany. From them, I can get a dedicated server with lots more capacity for about the same cost (it'd actually go up a little because I'd solve a few other problems that doing this would bring within range). Unfortunately, they do not offer Arch Linux as an option. I sent their support team a message asking about this, and I've included their response below. It sounds like heartburn to me. I don't have a lot of experience installing Arch Linux (Linode *does* offer it as an option and I installed via Bridge Linux on my desktops). I'm hoping this isn't as weird as it sounds. (I've actually never heard of a KVMoIP.) Is what they're offering a reasonable proposition? How weird is it really? Thanks! - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Ticket#2013031910000443] Arch Linux? Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:33:56 +0100 From: Contabo Support Team <support(a)contabo.com> Organization: Contabo GmbH To: benfell(a)parts-unknown.org Dear Mr Benfell, Thank you for your e-mail. Unfortunately, we can not offer you an automated installation of Arch Linux on our dedicated servers. But we could offer you to attach a KVMoIP and an USB drive with the installation media of Arch Linux to your server. This option is free of charge for a new dedicated server order and it would be possible for you to install your preferred Linux distribution by yourself. If you want to agree with this offer, please order the dedicated server on our website and add a note at the end of the ordering process about Arch Linux and the manual installation with the KVMoIP. http://contabo.com/?show=servers If you have any questions or need help, please do not hesitate to contact us. - -- Best regards, Stephan Forster Technischer Support / Technical support Contabo GmbH Aschauer StraÃe 32a 81549 MÃ¼nchen http://www.contabo.com E-mail: support(a)contabo.com Tel.: +49 (0) 89 3564717 70 Fax: +49 (0) 89 216 658 62 Visit us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/contaboCom Amtsgericht MÃ¼nchen HRB 180722 Authorized executives: Michael Herpich & Michael BÃ¶lke ___________________________________________________________ Please do not change the subject line of this e-mail. Only by this you make sure that your answer will not be out of context. Please direct all support issues directly to support(a)contabo.com . This will guarantee fastest processing possible. ___________________________________________________________ 19.03.2013 04:30 - David Benfell schrieb: > Hi, > > I am leaning in favor of renting a dedicated server from your > organization, but my preferred Linux distribution is > Arch--principally because it is a rolling distribution. > > I'm aware that a bleeding edge distribution is generally not > recommended for production servers, but I've had good luck with > Arch, and would prefer to stick with them. > > I do not see Arch among your offerings. Would it be possible to do > this? > > Thanks! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRSOEHAAoJELJhbl/uPb4SLSQP+wZk2Nk/b8UTUbjBON1jwOOs o47hcnxkXKj0E6tOlDwBd77/obpwOTTDgNCWRBICPQFLkiP3/MrDvNedsXmRg0Vj +TZuoyUs17bNzcMnQ+vRauAtsvsX7Np/iTU3+Brv60sDdBv/wh25b31SCDtIuEDJ LEKvC25LERywWiZIW1uEqwnblV/PpmK5MDyDKcghI1XWwd6jkYWOHNobhq2wBFbC dkqJS6uBTY3LOSmCb9fIAWpfN1qVw/r3KjOARIS2Shqm86ccYjcZlQBBp0RfFGvH EVh8iZJ3ONqWqgF1UHwiCn4hY9GCasRI91bqWHbx7FH/soIEW8SIAUDHirP/UUFk Yc8Ib7zAwq4WY2pBfcIOiAhdikyFw8R6fDWOWb7/kXTi27vg8uoiqcPekdq/1pfC JsCN/sLa4yNdYBDdOTCYxpx8DRPB9qyOWff5gD6bj5v6WDPsCG6xH4qO7SHBufiG OC/EClRJ85mvajdhwj76xqmOgX1b+UcOKvlxKcNsCjdUsxM6640XOzFrNd2Gd+0a n+KEh6Cj2nak9GVJWMWVzgRwu1W0W/d1x7BGEbPcVtnpBCK+X4A8ZrzEbTyz6QUq J9Qu6vdcOIqMpsjpNHqjRkAWFyLdDtXC1T0boR+QyjEWL2E/dJTiX6qqdof9SP77 1M80Ds7RhISExWZ/jk3Z =eCnQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

[arch-general] Cannot boot archboot iso with 64 bits kernel : no init found.
by fredbezies 19 Mar '13

19 Mar '13

Hello. Either my ISO is busted or archboot ISO is in a bad shape. Every single time I try to boot archboot ISO in virtualbox, I got a kernel panic starting with a "Failed to execute /init" And then : "Kernel Panic - not syncing : No init found". Getting this with x86_64, x86_64 LTS. It works with both i686 options ! -- Frederic Bezies fredbezies(a)gmail.com

1 0

[arch-general] Is last archboot iso completely busted ?
by fredbezies 19 Mar '13

19 Mar '13

I was looking for an up-to-date archboot iso, and the last one is really broken. I'm speaking of archlinux-2013.03-1-archboot-dual.iso When I try to do a network based installation, package grabbing failed, with this error : errot : target not found : netctl. If I try doing a cdrom based installation, in configuration part, I cannot modify any single configuration file. I'm told they do not exist. Known bugs ? Busted ISO ? -- Frederic Bezies fredbezies(a)gmail.com

6 12

[arch-general] What changed dual-boot grub definition (hd0, 0) -> (hd0, 1)
by David C. Rankin 18 Mar '13

18 Mar '13

All, Just a note. After working through the update that brought in systemd, a final issue is that somehow the drive designation for grub (legacy) for the windows partition was changed from (hd0,0) to (hd0,1). This box is a simple old dell box with a single 500G drive. Windows has 80G and the rest in Arch. The dual boot for windows definition in grub menu.lst has always been: title Windows rootnoverify (hd0,0) makeactive chainloader +1 'cat /proc/partitions' showed sda and then sda2 as the first primary partition. sda1 was no longer created by the system. Is there some reason that sda1 would be completely missing on the system where it had always been there before? This required the corresponding change of the menu.lst definition to: title Windows rootnoverify (hd0,1) makeactive chainloader +1 While the fix is simple, what caused the loss of sda1 in the first place? This box has booted Arch and then XP as (hd0,0) since 2009. Now it requires (hd0,1). Is this related to the same udev issue that caused eth0 -> enp2s0? If so, can I rely on it staying sda2 going forward or do I need another softlink in /etc/udev/rules.d to make it so? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

3 2