November 2016 - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] readline 7.0 rebuild for self-maintained packages
by Bastian Beischer 08 Nov '16

08 Nov '16

Dear all, I will need to rebuild some of my packages which I maintain myself for readline 7.0. Is there a reliable way to find out which packages need a rebuild? How was the rebuild list for the official repos made? Thanks Bastian -- Bastian Beischer RWTH Aachen University of Technology @RWTH Aachen Office: 28 C 203 Phone: +49-241-80-27205 E-mail: beischer(a)physik.rwth-aachen.de Address: I. Physikalisches Institut B, Sommerfeldstr. 14, D-52074 Aachen @CERN Office: Bdg 32-4-B12 Phone: +41-22-76-75750 E-mail: bastian.beischer(a)cern.ch Address: CERN, CH-1211 Geneve 23

2 2

[arch-general] new /etc/nsswitch.conf
by Damjan Georgievski 07 Nov '16

07 Nov '16

there's a new /etc/nsswitch.conf file in filesystem-2016.11 Maybe someone would care to explain the changes? maybe even a news post? https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/fil… -- damjan

2 1

[arch-general] kernel linux-4.8.6-1-x86_64 not able to load modules
by Anast Gramm 06 Nov '16

06 Nov '16

Hey list, After, as suggested in arch-annoucne, I force-upgrated ttf-dejavu I made a full system upgrade with pacman -Syu. This installed the latest linux kernel. (the one in the subject line) The initram was completed successfully and I procceded to reboot. Then Xserver would complain about my intel module (i915) After a while I figured that nothin was loaded. I had no internet connection (ip link would only show loopback), when I plugged a USB drive the kernel woudln't detect it, and so on... I downgraded to linux-4.8.4 using arch live with arch-chroot. Everything works but when I upgrade to the latest kernel the same thing happens. Since I am prety new to the linux power user world, I have no idea what to do next. Should I file a bug? Ad if yes how do I do that? Also about the kernel upgrade, should I just skip 4.8.6 and get the next one? Since I didn't see anything in the list about linux-4.8.6 I guess it must have something to do with my setup. Any suggestions will be really helpful!

4 6

[arch-general] Almost system crash, users getting logged out
by J. C. 05 Nov '16

05 Nov '16

Hi list, I had an "almost crash" last night. When I got up in the morning, the session on the first six TTYs were closed, but the sessions on TTY 8-10 were still open. Having taken a look at the journal, I found a lot of activity around 4AM. That may have been preceeded by something around midnight, when my music player suddenly quit, the system informing me, that there was not enough memory. A restart of the music player was successful though. I don't have any remote login services active and this sort of thing hasn't happened before, not on Arch since my installation a few weeks ago nor on the previous system. My kernel version is 4.8.2, not having rebooted since the last upgrade. The journal excerpt with the potential problem is here: https://freeshell.de/~silvain/journal.log I'd be grateful for any help and of course eagre to supply any further info to solve this issue. Thank you and best wishes Jeanette -------- When you need someone, you just turn around and I will be there <3

3 7

[arch-general] Getting Groove to Work Properly Under Arch?
by Hunter Jozwiak 05 Nov '16

05 Nov '16

Hi, I am not sure if anyone has been having a similar issue, so here goes. I recently signed up for Groove Music so that i can have a cross- platform means of accessing my collection (primarily from my Arch box and the Xbox). I have discovered that there is a Groove web client so this should, in theory work. But practice, at the current moment, is not equal to theory; I am getting an error about how Groove can't play a particular song. Before, I was getting an error about how Flash is required, so I've installed the flashpluggin package. This is where I stand now. Does anyone have any pointers to a resolution? -- Regards, Hunter Jozwiak

1 0

[arch-general] Iptables block https traffic apache
by Maykel Franco 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

Hi, I have configured apache + php + mysql in my house. I like block the specific url traffic over https... I found this: iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 443 -m string --string "anything" --algo kmp -j REJECT But not works... With http works very well... Any ideas?? Thanks in advanced.

3 3

[arch-general] ttf-dejavu putting files in the wrong place
by Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hi The fontconfig for the package should go in /etc/fonts/conf.avail since I was advised to create symbolic links to /etc/fonts/conf.d/ to enable specific features. If this is not the case, the wiki needs to be updated. Thanks guys! Regards Jagan

3 3

[arch-general] Cannot start 0ad (libboost problems)
by Peter Nabbefeld 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

Hello, when I want to start "0ad", I'm getting the following error message: /usr/bin/pyrogenesis: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_filesystem.so.1.61.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've already tried to re-install boost and boost-libs. Kind regards Peter

3 3

[arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu
by Peter Nabbefeld 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

Hello, cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts. ----------- Output ----------- Fehler: Konnte den Vorgang nicht durchführen (In Konflikt stehende Dateien) ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-sans.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-serif.conf existiert im Dateisystem Fehler sind aufgetreten, keine Pakete wurden aktualisiert. ----------- Translation for output ----------- Error: Could not proceed (files in conflict) ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf exists in file system ... Errors occured, no packages updated ----------- Kind regards Peter

5 9

[arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)
by Patrick Burroughs (Celti) 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:16:21 +0100 Levente Polyak <anthraxx(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > On 10/31/2016 04:03 PM, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > > As a middle ground, I think it would be more reasonable (or at > > least, less unreasonable) to modify makepkg to allow signing > > PKGBUILDs, or at least parts of them. For an existing example, > > OpenBSD's signify(1) uses their cryptographic signature system to > > sign a simple list sha256sums. > > > > Perhaps makepkg could include, e.g., a sha256sumsigs array, that > > contains a PGP signature (signed by the developer/TU's official key) > > of the contents (properly serialised by makepkg so there's a minimum > > of possible ambiguity) of the sha256sums array? > > > > That is literally a _completely_ different topic that addresses > _completely_ different areas. > You are speaking about authenticating the build scripts itself. That > does not solve _anything_ at all what this thread/topic/todo-list is > about. It really is not. I am not speaking of authenticating the build scripts; both this thread and my proposal are talking about ensuring the integrity of downloaded source files. Specifically, I am speaking of cryptographically signing the checksums for source files downloaded by the build scripts, so that they download what the author of the build script _intended_ them to download. This is presumably the same reason for ensuring sources are downloaded via HTTPS instead of HTTP, where possible — adding a cryptographic authentication to ensure someone building a package does not get sources without being aware they are modified: only embedding signatures in the PKGBUILD is trusting the Arch devs via the pacman keyring or parallel method, instead of the (flawed) CA system. If there is another reason to switch to HTTPS, please — make me aware of it! Also the very first reply in the thread talked about adding upstream signatures instead of changing the protocol, where possible — only not every upstream offers or _wants_ to offer them, so I proposed, in response to a prompt for discussion on the subject in the mail I quoted, a way to make that feasible. > Don't get me wrong: I don't judge about it at all, I'm just saying > that both are fully independent from each other and you should please > open a new thread if you want to discuss this rather then hijack this > thread :) I really, really don't think they're independent from each other, and as I'm not authorised to post on arch-dev-public and didn't expect to draw this out into a conversation, I simply replied to the thread on arch-general. Bowing to peers, however... et voila: a new thread. ~Celti

8 13