On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
All depends on what the ultimate goals for the distro are. Me? I wouldn't change a thing. I like Arch the way it is and I hope it stays like this until I'm old and gray (sh... I'm getting there ;-)
I don't think Arch should try to keep up with the Jones' or worry about what distro watch says. But, in the alternative, if the goal is to see just how far and how widely accepted Arch can become in hopes of selling out to someone like Novell, Corel, etc.., then it might make sense to look a bit harder at what makes the rating meter tick.
Personally, I don't think all the money in the world would be worth sacrificing the niche Arch has carved out for itself in the Linux community...
I agree completely, and that's really what I was trying to get at by posing that question