Re: [arch-general] Vim with X

On 11/15/11 at 11:57pm, Ray Rashif wrote:

On 15 November 2011 22:00, Manolo Martínez <manolo@austrohungaro.com> wrote: The policy had already been revised when the split was made to have vim and gvim. Vim had to become lightweight as many people were complaining about its bulk.

Thanks for the explanation, Ray. I guess I should learn to make do without copying among X programs, as those people doubtlessly do. Manolo