It would appear that on Jan 13, Madhurya Kakati did say:
On 01/13/12 at 08:55am, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Excerpts from Madhurya Kakati's message of Fri Jan 13 07:23:43 +0100 2012:
Mailed just to say that all of my problems have been resolved. It was a weird bug with mutt.
Yeah like, adding "Re:" on every fucking message and not using In-reply-to or References tag, and break my fucking threads. No offense :)
Sorry for that. How do I configure mutt to use In-reply-to instead of adding Re: to the subject?(if it is possible to do so.)
Pardon me for jumping in here, but if mutt isn't smart enough to automatically use In-Reply-To: and/or References: headers on replies? Or likes to add extra Re: (IE: Re: Re: Re:) to the subject header line? {All of which is news to me BTW...} Then I gotta ask, "why use it?" If it's because it runs in the console, then my real question is have you tried alpine? It certainly does use those thread friendly Message-ID: based reply headers and seldom {if ever} adds any redundant "Re:" tags to the "Subject:" header line. It's also highly configurable with a comprehensive built in help system. It can use local Linux mail spool and/or remote IMAP folders (or even pop inboxes). It can be configured to use local sendmail or remote SMTP servers. And it also does NNTP... It comes with it's own editor/composer but can easily be configured to use your choice of alternate editors (I use vim with it)... Just a thought... -- | --- ___ | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | ~\___/~ <<jtwdyp@ttlc.net>>