25 Oct
2011
25 Oct
'11
3:38 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev <lisaev@umail.iu.edu> wrote:
On (10/24/11 18:00), Karol Blazewicz wrote: -~> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev <lisaev@umail.iu.edu> wrote: -~> > Besides, one really doesn't have to enable testing in pacman.conf -- individual -~> > pacman -U will do, imho. -~> -~> I've read that [testing] is all or nothing and you shouldn't -~> cherrypick packages because you might break something. -~> Somewhat relevant https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=127144
That's where brain comes in handy :)
Yes, its a REALLY good idea to state that its okay to pacman -U individual [testing] packages on a public mailing list with at least some users who really don't know any better than to do just that.