On 2 February 2010 13:43, Ty John <ty-ml@eye-of-odin.com> wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:13:38 -0600 "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> wrote:
On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels. Developers need not maintain the old version. Let it be in the cache of the user. But pacman should not remove the older one after upgrade.
I 2nd that motion ....
As previously mentioned, that is what the user's local cache is for.
Urmm..if it is so important, Arch gives you the power to roll your own kernel. Heck, I don't even have a fallback, because I don't need it. Like Fons, I have an RT kernel, and a normal kernel. Either acts as a backup of the other, since neither gets updated along with the other. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD