On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in testing.
Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland- compat. From your message I understand it should come with redland as dependency so that libreoffice wouldn't complain...
you should do a pacman -Syu. now redland-compat doesn't conflict with redland anymore and can be installed along with it.
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
redland-1.0.13-1 redland-compat-1.0.12-3
Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet.