2011/3/9 Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net> wrote:
For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area where unsupported packages go within its repositories as well. That might get the message across to even windows users. Certainly if I do a new installation of arch-linux I'd want libri-openoffice-supported on my system as opposed to anything else.On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
just an fyi, openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version of openoffice imo, so there should really be no one that uses it.
People who want openoffice will probably just use the -bin packages?
I think naming the libreoffice packages libre-openoffice packages is just misleading. People should learn the new name.
+1 LibreOffice is perfect,and the old openoffice name should be mentioned in the package description.