Re: [arch-general] Announcing pacpak

On 07/11/2016 05:01 PM, Maxwell Anselm via arch-general wrote:

I think the tool is great Florian, but I do not think that it warrants official support. Consider examples like pacgem or pip2pkgbuild. These tools help integrate Ruby/Python packages (which are usually managed via a separate package manager) into pacman. They are great for users who want pacman to be the single package manager for their entire system, but they are still just AUR packages without official support.

I agree. This is a reasonable argument at least until Flatpak becomes much more popular. I will set it up elsewhere. Regards, Florian Pelz