so can we get a dev to comment on this? what do they think about mirroring this stuff

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Luke S Crawford <lsc@prgmr.com> wrote:
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> writes:
> You could use Mysql replication (master-slave).  I have some experience
> working with replication setups, so I can help you if you want.  In the
> event the master goes down you can use your slave as read-only copy or
> even do writes on it, but then you'll need to push the changes back to
> the original master when it comes back up.  In the latter case, you
> could also do master-master replication and not use your master at all
> (unless the other one goes down).

If everyone is on a fast enough network, I've always liked the  master-master
MySQL cluster setup, but I don't think I've used it over long-haul links.

I believe that if you do have a MySQL cluster in one location, you can
use that as a master for master-slave replication to a terciary.

btw, I can kick in a Xen VPS or two, if you are ok with a 10Mbps cap.
I'll have quite a bit of excess ram/cpu after this weekend.