"Eric Bélanger" <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
"Ionuț Bîru" <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
Hi,
I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home
of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or
is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
Thank you for your kind attention.
Yours,
is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like that. makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote: page this them
at all.
-- Ionuț
Indeed, but can still create a separate 'any' package like we do with some games. Just a split package won't work there.
FTR, there used to be a seperate 'any' imagemagick-doc packge but I just removed it because it was too much work and it was often forgotten when other devs were rebuilding or updating imagemagick. Plus, it's only 3MB.
I see. Making it split package and disregarding 'any' seems fairly reasonable considering the size. I have some 100MB doc packages though so I have some separate 'any' packages.