On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:54, Óscar García Amor <ogarcia@moire.org> wrote:
El vie, 02-05-2025 a las 00:51 +0200, Camelia Lavender escribió:
I didn't want to participate in this discussion in the first place, but given the last few emails I've been receiving, I thought I should say something. I think that the direct reference and comparison to hitler and nazism (in the reply) was completely inappropriate and quite frankly unacceptable, because it is antisemitic, and it makes it look like those things weren't extremely serious. I think that this is exactly why there is a Code of Conduct for the forum in the first place.
Honestly, I see you all a bit exalted.
The original post talking about human rights and how they were being “trampled” because you simply cannot delete a package you have uploaded to the AUR without the help of a maintainer is quite ridiculous. Especially on the basis that “that's how AUR works and that's how it's stated in the rules[1]” so if you don't like it just don't contribute.
From that point on, such a ridiculous request deserved only a humorous response.
I think we're all a bit shouting in the void here at cross purposes A request for information, no matter that it was awkwardly put, should it be replied with in a toxic manner? I would argue that it shouldn't. And people moaning about their freedom of expression being trampled, seriously? You can be creative in your replies but there's no room for being toxic. As I said before, my opinion is that sometimes it's better to not reply (silence is golden after all.