Hi Ralf,
the thread is from April.
It arrived here today. Here's a summary of the Received fields. It seems the ‘131d’ delay was within archlinux.org. Tue 15 Apr 2025 03:04:38 +00:00:00 from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Zc6sy3c2qzFs33 for <arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> +00:00:00 from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Zc6sy73yMzDrk6 for <arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> 03:04:44 +00:00:06 from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEABA4CE2CC8 for <arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> Sun 24 Aug 18:55:50 +15:51:12+131d from [95.217.236.249] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380855A491BE 18:55:58 +15:51:20+131d from lists.archlinux.org (lists.archlinux.org [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c010:9eb4::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailwash54.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C944D164952 for <ralph@inputplus.co.uk> -- Cheers, Ralph.