4 Jun
2012
4 Jun
'12
8:59 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sudaraka Wijesinghe <sudaraka.wijesinghe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 06/04/12 23:48, Genes MailLists wrote:
Just to add another fedora link:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pjones/Features/SecureBoot
Sounds like they till plan to make use of the UEFI CA $99 signing service from Microsoft.
Do you think Arch should follow suit or require instead that Secure Boot is disabled?
gene/
If this is a poll, I vote "Arch should require Secure Boot to be disabled"
It's not a poll. I don't see how your ( idea / lack of choice ) is any better. Cheers, Sander