On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Andrei Thorp<garoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello there!
Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is the solution just "use google with site://"?
It seems to be kind of bad at finding stuff. Some examples: - Can't search by description (well, it does search by description by default, but it's not in the advanced options anywhere) - Can't really do any decent multi-word searches afaik. To take an example from the other argument thread, try searching for "java gstreamer". It finds neither gstreamer-java nor java-gstreamer. It actually finds nothing at all. - Similarly, wildcards seem to not work. "java*gstreamer" has no results. - It seems to not even do exact matches first. For example, search for my package, "sup". There is a package in AUR that's exactly named "sup", but if you search for that, you get 658 results, sorted alphabetically! - Which reminds me, what about sorting by relevance somehow? Perhaps sort by a weighting of votes, age, downloads, etc.
I'm sorry if I'm bringing this up as someone's already writing improvements for AUR and this is just a waste of time :)
Anyway, thanks! -- Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com)
<miguel> any new sendmail hole I have to fix before going on vacations? -- Seen on #Linux
The AUR interface has a seperate section in the bug tracker. There is also a seperate mailing list for its development. -- Greg