15 Aug
2012
15 Aug
'12
12:26 p.m.
[2012-08-15 14:01:16 +0200] Felipe Contreras:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Am 15.08.2012 13:34, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
No. The "services" (in systemd lingo) should be in an interpreted language: e.g. shell.
Why should they be? As far as I understand, they're human-readable text files. One might say this is an "interpreted language".
No, they are compiled binaries. The code is in C (not interpreted).
Please just shut up when you obviously have no clue what you are talking about. -- Gaetan