Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-09-29 00:55:12 +0200:
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 00:12 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-09-28 23:19:19 +0200:
On 29 September 2010 03:33, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-09-28 21:06:57 +0200:
Or use bauerbill and set mplayer to automatically compile from abs if there's an update =)
I'm curious, what can it actually do? Build from ABS, ok, but automatically with my modifications? What about alternative packages only found in AUR?
Check out the features:
"* option to trust specific AUR users to fully automate AUR package building"
Ok, but what does this mean? I see a list of features but it's hard to get see use cases from a list.
Trust an AUR user means I can for example trust myself and have it build a package from my sources. That's pretty much all it tells me. It doesn't tell me whether it solves any of my problems, whether it can do something like automatically building the latest version of packages with the options I want.
You can specify a patchdir which makes automatic modifications to the PKGBUILD. Its less useful than it sounds though, would prefer a bit more flexibility (like a 'hook' running some sed commands), but its great as-is.
So for example you can set it to 'always-build' mplayer, when there's an mplayer update that's what it will do. If there's a relevant patch in your PATCHDIR (or whatever its called now) that'll be applied.
This sounds pretty much like 'works fine as long as the maintainer only changes the version number'. Correct?
Trusting an AUR user simply means no prompt for 'are you sure you want to compile this, please check it first' for packages from said user.
Ok, so that's rather irrelevant. Thanks for the info, I currently use slurpy for AUR stuff and IgnorePkg for stuff that needs manual builds. It sounds as if bauerpill might help to improve the situation a little bit, so again, thanks.