On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Giovanni Scafora <linuxmania@gmail.com> wrote:
2008/5/1 bardo <ilbardo@gmail.com>:
Why? It's true that we're all waiting for our own testing repo, but using unstable won't help: the problem is AUR integration: a lot of work still has to be done before community can move to svn, and then support for an overlay repo has to be added from scratch.
The unstable repo is using svn now. Maybe, we could rename it to community?
We have community repo already, hand svn packages to community may work, but I still think it could be better to distinguish such packages from anothers. Unstable repo is useless if only a few people use it. Drop it if we can't make it more useful, that's why I propose for a rename, to try to bring it to the right direction. --
Giovanni Scafora Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull) http://www.archlinux.org linuxmania@gmail.com