Re: [arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

At Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2011 21:30 David C. Rankin wrote:

Just a quick question on the vi dependency of mailx. Why not mailx-

heirloom? It

provides a great deal more capability with attachments, and flexibility as a cli mailer. The issues is down in the noise, but why drive a pinto if you can drive a jag?

Okay, i'm not a dev, but mailx-heirloom provides mailx "provides=('mailx')" and therefore all shoould be fine. I myself ask me more why there is not conflicts array in the PKGBUILD of mailx-heirloom. :) See you, Attila