9 Aug
2012
9 Aug
'12
10:27 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote:
And you don't want systemd because you are sure it won't do what sysvinit can, even though you didn't try it.
I think the complaint here is that the switch itself is a problem. I think he made it rather clear that he's not criticizing systemd itself but the notion of forcing a switch. I've been bellowing to local linux user groups and friends that sysvinit needs to go for years but I understand the general resistance: Every change -- even the especially good and worthy ones -- requires effort. For some, that's too much.
Arch's policy on systemd vs. initscripts has not even been discussed among Arch developers yet...
This is really all that needed to be said.