27 Nov
2010
27 Nov
'10
5:02 a.m.
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered for an eventual default by chance?
Almost nothing is default on Arch...
Beh you know what I mean :-) i.e. "recommeded", only-one-or-the-other packages become PKG/PKG-alsa instead of PKG/PKG-pulse, package groups use pulse builds, etc etc... or am I off base? C Anthony [mobile]