I know. Just being a bit wary, with packages like gpg or crypt :)
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking
"If a needed public key is missing, or if you want to add public keys by other developers, you can import it manually, or you can find it on a keyserver and import it from there. Alternatively, you can temporarily disable makepkg's signature checking, by calling makepkg with the --skippgpcheck option."
On 06/03/2016 09:34 PM, Sławomir Szczyrba wrote:
Hello.
I try to recompile lib32-libgcrypt - because of this annoying error: libGL: dlopen /usr/lib32/xorg/modules/dri/radeonsi_dri.so failed (/usr/lib32/libgcrypt.so.20: symbol gpgrt_lock_lock, version GPG_ERROR_1.0 not defined in file libgpg-error.so.0 with link time reference)
and makepkg says :
[steev]/tmp/lib32-libgcrypt > LC_ALL=C LANG=en makepkg ==> Making package: lib32-libgcrypt 1.7.0-1 (Fri Jun 3 20:47:43 CEST 2016) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found libgcrypt-1.7.0.tar.bz2 -> Found libgcrypt-1.7.0.tar.bz2.sig ==> Validating source files with sha1sums... libgcrypt-1.7.0.tar.bz2 ... Passed libgcrypt-1.7.0.tar.bz2.sig ... Skipped ==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... libgcrypt-1.7.0.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key 2071B08A33BD3F06) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
All keys refreshed: gpg: refreshing 85 keys from hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net [...] gpg: Total number processed: 84 gpg: unchanged: 84
Missing key, or sth went really wrong?
Regards Sławek
Pozdrawiam, Sławek -- ________ Q: How many chickens does it take to screw in a light bulb? _/ __/ __/ A: Two-one to do it and one to cross the road. \__ \__ \_______________________________________________________________ /___/___/ Sławomir Szczyrba steev(AT)hot.pl