On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 15:04 +0100, Filipe Laíns via arch-general wrote:
Hey Gus,
I'm sorry but I'm not the maintainer :/. You'll need to talk to them again. If you think the closure of the bug was wrong I suggest to send a mail to the mailing list explaining this.
Why don't you use linux-hardened instead? It's up-to-date and has both options enabled (AppArmor and SELinux).
I feel that it's the biggest issue. We already have a kernel with both options enabled so there's no point on also adding them in the main one, given that those option require a lot of userspace support. Do you have relevant reason why you don't want to use linux-hardened? If so, that would probably change some things.
Thanks, Filipe Laíns 3DCE 51D6 0930 EBA4 7858 BA41 46F6 33CB B0EB 4BF2
Hey, Nevermind my reply. The email somehow didn't get moved to my mailing list folder so I thought it was sent to my address directly. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Filipe Laíns 3DCE 51D6 0930 EBA4 7858 BA41 46F6 33CB B0EB 4BF2