On 2024-07-27 at 02:53:14 -0500, "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/27/24 12:41 AM, İsmail Arılık wrote:
grep '^processor\|^cpu MHz' /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 1 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 2 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 3 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 4 cpu MHz : 851.190 processor : 5 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 6 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 7 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 8 cpu MHz : 1083.960 processor : 9 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 10 cpu MHz : 1006.537 processor : 11 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 12 cpu MHz : 942.949 processor : 13 cpu MHz : 968.000 processor : 14 cpu MHz : 1361.782 processor : 15 cpu MHz : 1400.012 processor : 16 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 17 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 18 cpu MHz : 400.000 processor : 19 cpu MHz : 1384.733
And I just re-opened the lid to check for activity on my post.
Honestly, those do not look bad. You have 12 cores at dead-idle (400MHz) and 8 cores at 1400MHz or less. I'm no 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) expert, but that seems reasonable for just opening up the lid and the various processes coming back to life.
Okay, maybe not too bad.
A 24-core laptop -- what's the world coming to :)
No, just 20, but I agree with your sentiment. :-) 6 performance cores, each with hyperthreading, so 2 cores each. 8 efficiency cores, no hyperthreading, for a total of 20. I try not to replace my computer too often, but the pattern has always been to buy something bigger than I really need.
Good luck with your issue. Maybe others have more than a guess -- but that's all I've got for you.
Thanks. Regards, Dan