On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila <vodoo0904@sonnenkinder.org> wrote:
At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads. other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one.
+100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-)
To be clear:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to give this the rest of the day to simmer down, then I'm going to start moderating/banning accounts
Notice that "accounts" is the plural, not the singular.
Err. I don't think you should do that unless they become a pure nuisance. I am facing a similar situation with Squidoo. Because of someone else on my subnet (I have static ip), spamming on their site (or may be due to a virus, its a common scene here), they have banned the whole subnet. And now even after several request they won't whitelist me. You may end up banning some for none of their mistake. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com