It's ok now not because of the wiki and the AUR, but thanks to the existence of systemd-free.org. It had to be created because of the above, which would'nt have happened with a better community.
So far I've not seen anyone in this thread, or in the replies by Poettering referenced by systemd-free.org as "Arrogance and crappy attitude", actually pressure anyone into doing (or not doing) anything. Choices have been made based on what those making the choices think is sane, and you are free to undo that choice at any time. What/who in "the community" motivates even having this endless discussion when the (in MHO excellent) choice to package systemd by default has already been made and it works perfectly well? I never said systemd shouldn't be packaged by default!
If something was removed from the Wiki for "no good reason", just add it back, or put systemd-free.org up as a reference and be done with it. Someone already talked about putting it back in the forums. They were turned down because of those points («no reason for 2 methods», etc.). This among other things (which are evident in any discussion in Arch about OpenRC) signals a bad community. There were many great users that stopped using Arch because of this, it is a problem that needs to be recognized. I don't anything near this kind of attitude, say, in Gentoo mailing lists.
João Miguel