On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, dave reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
I think gdb is fine... but I have not used it extensively. I'd appreciate reports from anyone who has extensively used gdb and valgrind with the new glibc.
Allan
I've been using valgrind on the new glibc. It reports a whole new slew of warnings for previously "quiet" code, but otherwise performs as expected.
Curl example: http://codepad.org/htorjWF9
dave
Followup: I'm not able to find a whole lot of hard evidence from other people about this behavior aside from a Cygwin related post [1] which I can't personally reproduce. I've opened FS#19634 with a possible resolution. [1] http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2010-05/msg00024.html d