6 Mar
2014
6 Mar
'14
3:45 p.m.
Am 06.03.2014 16:19, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
If I understand correctly, in fact I took the set up upside down. I tried br0 ---> enp7s0 when in fact the scheme is
|-----> dev 1
enp7s0 ----> bridge br0 ----|
|------> dev 2
Am I correct in this scheme?
What do you mean by dev 1 and dev 2?
Independently of what dev1 and dev2 are, the answer is 'no'.