26 Oct
2013
26 Oct
'13
8:22 p.m.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
[2013-10-26 09:39:21 +0200] Carsten Mattner:
So that means Arch Linux has always been unique in that regard and it has been by lucky accidence static linking of libs installed by pacman worked?
Yes.
If that's the case this should be documented the same way other distros (suckless) do not support dynamic linking of the provided packages don't you think?
It's obvious that static libs aren't supported by distros that ship none, don't you think?
Yes but this was news to me and is unusual. So this should be stated clearly on archlinux.org or at least the wikipedia article.