27 Feb
2014
27 Feb
'14
6:10 p.m.
Guys, the goal of this "slanted ranting" (really?) is to propose a good solution and make Arch better. Please think out of the box and answer one question: Would a separate netctl-wifi-menu package that depends on dialog, wpa_supplicant and dhcpcd be better or not - and why? My answer is yes: it will make wifi-menu usable to anyone who wants to use wifi-menu and installs the package. I am really opposed to answers like "No, because that's why the maintainer wanted this package to look like". Any good idea can be denied with this type of argumentation. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu