On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
I support this idea. Keep most games in AUR and the more popular ones can have their own repo [games] on a separate server. This server could be community financed using donations and if not enough interest will be raised for new repo, all these huge games can be moved to AUR and the smaller ones can stay in [community].
That's my view at it. Having another repo for large packages is not useful. The benefit of
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:40, Matej Ľach <matej.lach@gmail.com> wrote: the old arch-games project was just that we compiled and hosted things that weren't already in the repo.
What exactly would be too large? LibreOffice? jre7-openjdk? Qt? ;-) I'm with Daenyth here: provide an unofficial repo if you like but don't drop apps that are in the official repos - excluding the nexuiz-xonotic switcheroo.