On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:44 PM, David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2012 12:51 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys,
As most devs have done already, I'm going to change my relationship with arch-general.
What is the preferred way to contact you or other devs with questions or suggestions (better wording for an announcement etc.)?
We don't currently have a satisfactory answer to this question. Hopefully a solution will present itself soon, I know people are discussing the problem. After all, we DO want useful feedback, and there IS really good feedback inbeetween all the rest.
I guess important stuff should still be picked up by someone, alternatively you could cc the relevant dev (who e.g. wrote the news item, etc.).
You know I have been watching this really destructive war of attrition on this list for quite some time - and it is reminiscent of the long flame wars that occurred on the Fedora general list that led me to unsubscribe from the Fedora list and start looking at Arch as the distribution for my laptops.
And numerous other places. As far as I know, the problem has never been solved and has laid waste in nearly all of them, with the result that support has become harder to find.
There is almost always a tension between those who know what they are doing and those who don't. In my own field, I lose patience with naves rather quickly, so I'm hardly in a position to lecture anyone about this. That said, by contrast, there are a few developers out there who seem gifted at the human relations part of this, are brilliant at the hand-holding that is sometimes needed, and I think are not so often recognized. They're also often working on ancillary projects for which there are easy alternatives rather than core stuff. Distributions, init, the kernel, even desktop environments I think fall into this latter category where replacement can mean ripping out a lot of stuff and building from scratch.
Our (emphasis on the collective) failure to solve this, however, is debilitating, not only for existing users for whom support is harder to find, but in terms of attracting future users, not just to Arch but to the open source community in general.
Yes - sadly there are no winners in a war of attrition - and everyone loses - the good guys get blown away along with the tide of destruction which is so sad. It would be so much better if everyone really thought carefully about trying to contribute positively, and not negatively and destructively - people are much more likely to listen to reasoned argument and feel more likely they can add to the positive ideas being discussed. When it gets personal then that is usually the beginning of the end-game - it is pointless and you get the cycle of tornado damage - especially in such a public domain as a mailing list. The real shame is how it takes so few to create such a disaster - I hope that everyone who has contributed to this debacle will think carefully about what they have done - and I also hope that any key contributors who have felt at wit's end and want out, will be able to take time to let calm return so that they may be able to come back and feel that their contributions are valued - there is a huge silent majority who value hugely what the developers have created collectively and individually to make our system the capable and functional system that we run every day on our systems. I live in hope for an improved atmosphere on this list after a night's sleep and more settled thoughts. -- mike c