7 May
2009
7 May
'09
12:05 a.m.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Thomas Bohn <thomas@bohnomat.de> wrote:
On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of vim/gvim while vi sits in testing.
I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Both makes it complex.
Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before,
Actually, I don't see a big problem with vim having provides/conflicts with vi, so that it will completely supplant it. That way we also cover the users who USE and EXPECT 'vim' but still type 'vi' (sigh)