On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked@gmail.com>wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ionut Biru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
pacman -Qo /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/swrast_dri.so pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
Thank you Ionut. The conflicting files are owned by libgl 9.0.2-1 - but
I am unsure whether this means that libgl needs to be removed before running the updates? Will mesa-libgl then replace the functionality that libgl currently provides? I'd like to be sure before doing this so I don't do something that could cause my system graphics to fail. I did not see any announcement saying this was going to happen?
OK I saw your post in arch-dev-public about removing libgl from extra, and also that re-running the pacman update now also replaces libgl with mesa-libgl - so this is resolved.
Thanks -- mike c